Peer Tutoring Program Expansion

Peer Tutoring Program Expansion
Expanding Peer Tutoring Program: a people‑centered visual of data‑informed growth, collaboration, and student success.

Designing and executing a data-informed growth strategy to expand a peer tutoring program, increasing tutor capacity, student reach and academic impact.

Context

  • Peer tutoring program had limited participation despite being a paid opportunity
  • Low awareness across campuses and among students
  • Insufficient number of tutors to meet student demand
  • Gaps in coverage for high-need courses and evening support
  • Inefficient matching and scheduling processes
  • Growing need for academic support in first-year and high-risk courses

The Problem

  • Too few tutors to support student demand
  • Limited visibility and awareness of tutoring opportunities
  • Difficulty recruiting tutors with the right expertise and availability
  • Inconsistent faculty engagement in identifying strong candidates
  • Inefficient processes for connecting tutors and students

My Role

As Associate Vice President for Teaching and Learning, I led the strategy in partnership with the Senior Director of Student Support Services, who managed day-to-day operations. Together, we designed and implemented a plan that would:

  • Increase the number of qualified peer tutors
  • Expand student access to tutoring services
  • Improve coverage for high-demand courses and time slots
  • Strengthen faculty engagement in recruitment
  • Create a more scalable and sustainable tutoring model

Approach

1. Awareness and Recruitment Strategy

I launched a multi-channel campaign including campus flyers and digital outreach, student communications from leadership and QR-enabled materials for easy access and sign-up. I repositioned peer tutoring as a flexible, remote-friendly job and resume-building opportunity.

2. Faculty-Driven Talent Identification

I partnered with faculty to identify high-performing students and encouraged direct, one-on-one outreach to potential tutors, shifting from passive referrals to active recruitment conversations.

3. Incentives and Role Design

I introduced targeted incentives to address gaps in coverage, such as higher pay for evening hours, opportunities to work alongside faculty in quasi-TA roles and campus-based perks and recognition. I created a digital badging system (in collaboration with instructional design) to recognize sustained tutoring contributions and provide resume-ready credentials (e.g., subject-area expertise badges).

4. Operational Improvements

I addressed inefficiencies in tutor-student matching and scheduling, expanded flexibility in tutor availability and course coverage and improved alignment between tutor expertise and course needs.

5. Data-Driven Iteration

I analyzed course-level demand, tutor availability and utilization and student engagement patterns. I continuously refined recruitment, incentives, and coverage strategies.

Impact

Program Growth

  • Increased peer tutors from ~15 to ~30 (+50%) within six months
  • Expanded student reach from ~50 to ~130 students per week
  • Increased course coverage from ~15 to ~18 courses across key programs

Student Outcome Impact

  • Improved performance in high-risk courses, particularly:
    • Anatomy & Physiology
    • Fundamental Nursing courses
  • Contributed to measurable gains in first-year retention
  • Increased student satisfaction, with strong positive feedback and repeat tutor requests

Operational Impact

  • Improved alignment between tutor expertise, course needs and scheduling
  • Increased availability of evening and high-demand support
  • Reduced strain on overstretched academic support teams by distributing workload more effectively

Tools & Capabilities Demonstrated

  • Program design and growth strategy
  • Cross-functional collaboration (faculty, marketing, student support)
  • Data-informed decision-making
  • Student success and retention strategy
  • Incentive design and engagement strategy